RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘apple’

Apple – a slight frustration

28 Nov

I love Apple products. They are elegant and they do what you need them to do.

Apple has designed the most popular smartphone on the planet.

Why, then, do they not have a mobile-friendly version of their website? It seems somewhat counter productive to me.

 
 

Search Keywords: apple cards

09 Nov

With yesterday’s discussion on using tools to see what people are searching for, I’m happy that I’ve now got a great example. As I was looking through my logs, I noticed something interesting. I’d had a few hits from computers in the apple.com domain. Someone from Apple had been looking at my blog, specifically the post about Apple’s Cards app. As I investigated further, the first visit was from someone who had searched for “apple cards” in Google, and a quick look now shows that post is on page one of Google’s results. The other four visits from Apple didn’t have any “referrer” information – that is, they didn’t link to my blog from a web page, but were direct links. Typically this means that either someone typed it in to their browser, or it was linked from a non-browser application, such as a mail client or instant messenger client. This in turn suggests that the first person who found that blog entry was interested enough in it to share it with other people at Apple.

So, now I know Apple is listening, I have some suggestions.

  • The “copy” icon is unintuitive. I didn’t realise it meant copy, and when I tapped it, it took me into editing the card, but the recipient address seemed to have just vanished. Of course, if you’re copying a card, it makes sense to remove the recipient from the envelope, because you’re hardly likely to send that card to the same person. However, because it took me into the copy of the card to edit it, and the address was missing, I thought that something had gone wrong. A little pop-up saying that you’re now editing a copy of the card would have been helpful.
  • All of the card templates are in landscape format. It would be nice to have some in portrait. If I go to the store to look at cards there, almost all of them are in portrait, so it felt odd that there were no portrait templates.
  • It would be nice to have some different colour schemes. I’m not asking for free range in selecting colours, because I know how people who aren’t professional graphic designers can do horrendous things with bad colour selection. However, to be able to pick a design, and then choose a colour theme from a selection of 4 or 5 would be a nice touch.
  • Another nice touch would be the ability to sign the card – either by signing with your finger on the app, or uploading an image of a signature so it is “hand written”, on the inside. A nice looking “love, Timothy” that is clearly in my own hand, perhaps stored within the app for future use, that I can add and place on the inside of the card would be a great feature. If you do this, there should be multiple signature images that you can save, as how you sign off depends on to whom you are sending the card.
  • Lastly, and this is the feature that I think would be absolutely fantastic, would be the ability to purchase an iTunes or Apple gift certificate from within the Card app. This would basically be automating the process I went through that I described in my earlier blog post about the Cards app. Then the redemption code can be added to the card automatically without any risk of mistranscribing it. It also means a single purchase is made, and let’s be honest, if the feature is available directly from within the app, more people are likely to do it, which therefore means more revenue.

So there it is – my thoughts on how the Cards app can be improved. I know you’re listening, Apple, so it’s now your move.

 

Apple’s “Cards” App

06 Nov

With iOS 5, Apple introduced a new app, called “Cards”. It’s really easy to use. First, select an appropriate category – such a birthday, seasonal, love, travel. Then, select a card style – some have a picture, and most have a little bit of text on the front.

Once you’ve done that, you can add your own picture (to the ones that have a picture), and change the text on the front to personalise it.

Next, you can change the text on the inside of the card. Again, really easy to do. If you prefer, you can go with the default text, or just change it a little.

Then, the envelope, select your own contact info from your address book for your return address, and select a contact for the recipient. If the recipient isn’t in your contacts, you can type in the address.

Once that’s all done, you tap the price, confirm the purchase, validate your iTunes account, and you’re done. A real physical card will be sent.

All in all, it’s an easy app to use. The cost is $2.99 (plus tax) to send to the US, which when you consider the price of cards in the shops, plus postage, is actually quite reasonable, especially as this will be personalised in a way you couldn’t do with a regular card.

One bright idea I had – I purchased an iTunes gift certificate, the ones that get emailed, and sent it to myself. I then copied and pasted the redemption code from the email into the card. The recipient can then use that code when they get the card.

I’m very happy with the app, so far – I await confirmation that the recipient received it and all was as it should be with anticipation.

[Update: I've made some suggestions on how Cards could be improved in a new blog entry]

 
 

Leopard Spaces

03 Dec

I recently installed Mac OS X Leopard on my MacBook. I like it so far, but I think an opportunity was missed. I like Spaces, which allows you to have virtual desktops to make things more uncluttered. However, when you add an external display, each virtual desktop increases in size to add that extra real estate. What would have been nice (in my opinion) would have been to realise two of the virtual desktops – one on the laptop, one on the additional display. That way, if I moved stuff to the external display, when I disconnect the display, instead of moving those windows to my local display, thus recluttering it, they just sit in the virtual space. Maybe that’s a relatively unusual way of doing it – after all, I am guessing it’s a small portion of users that would use a laptop with an external display in such a manner on a regular basis. Still, the option would have been nice.